top of page

UX STRATEGY • PRODUCT DESIGN

Research. Strategy. Systems Design. AI.

I design products that help people understand and trust systems they can't fully see — from machine vision overlays to GPS-connected hardware. That's been my work for over two decades. AI just made it more interesting. (See how I'm integrating AI into my design process.)

Video_overlay.png

Machine Vision

geneva-one.jpg

Wearable

nostradamus-convergence.png

AI • AGEnts

23

YEARS EXPERIENCE

3

TECHNOLOGY COMPANIES

Multiple

PATENTS FILED/GRANTED

01

Selected Work

Case Studies

Global Trend Engine

Designer & Builder

•

Self-Initiated

•

1 week

→

An agentic AI dashboard where three agents — a multi-persona scanner, Nostradamus, and Tarot — scan the web for frontier signals, synthesize patterns, and generate predictive convergence insights — designed, built, and deployed with Claude.

AI Product DesignAgentic SystemsData VisualizationFuturologyPrompt Engineering

Lytx Video Overlay

Senior UX Designer

•

Lytx

•

4 months

→

A dynamic video overlay that simplifies customer coaching conversations, improving user trust, and reducing contention rate to near zero.

Machine VisionUser ResearchVisual Design

Lytx Driver ID

Senior UX Designer

•

Lytx

•

3 months

→

A systematic user flow for assignment, distribution, and usage of QR codes to assign drivers to vehicles.

System DesignUser ResearchQA TestingHardware Prototyping

Timex Ironman ONE GPS+

UX Design Lead

•

Qualcomm / Timex

•

3 years

→

A full 0-to-1 product experience for athletes who wanted to track workouts, stay connected, and leave their phones behind.

FitnessWearablesPatentHardware UX

Tagg the Pet Tracker

UX Design & Product Management

•

Qualcomm

•

1.5 years

→

Redesign of a pet activity monitoring and management of iOS/Android app development as both UX lead and product manager.

Mobile DesigniOSAndroidSystem DesignProduct Management

FLO TV Personal Television

UX Design Lead

•

Qualcomm / FLO TV

•

1 year

→

Designing a new product category from the ground up: live mobile television.

Ethnographic ResearchUsability TestingUX DesignSystem DesignDesign Team Management

02

Expertise

Skills

User Research

Interviews, usability tests, ethnographic study, and contextual inquiry

Journey Mapping

End-to-end experience mapping across touchpoints

Interaction Design

Flows, wireframes, use cases, and high-fidelity mockups

Storytelling

Communicating design decisions to executives and cross-functional teams

Systems Thinking

Mapping connected flows and designing for scalability across surfaces

Prototyping

From low-fi click-throughs to high-fidelity AI coding

AI Fluency

Designing AI-powered experiences and using AI tools in the design process

Stakeholder Management

Cross-functional collaboration and design advocacy

Tools

Claude (Design/Code)

Research synthesis, design, prototyping, and documentation

Figma

Components, variants, auto-layout, and prototyping

Sketch

Vector UI design for components and high-fidelity screens

Axure RP

High-fidelity prototyping with conditional logic

Pendo

In-app guidance, feature tracking, and user surveys

Amplitude

Funnels, retention, and feature-adoption analysis

Dovetail

Centralized research insights and customer intelligence

Atlassian (Confluence/Jira)

Confluence for design documentation; Jira for planning and cross-functional tracking

03

Background

Experience & Education

2019 - Present

Senior Product Designer

Lytx • San Diego, CA

Research and design of user experience for video-safety and AI products, and development of an AI-native design process for the Product/UX team.

Design SystemsDesign LeadershipMachine Vision AIGenerative AI

2007 - 2018

Sr. Staff UX Designer & Sr. Product Manager

Qualcomm • San Diego, CA

Led 0-to-1 UX and product development for large-scale product start-ups while managing 3rd-party design teams.

Usability TestingPrototypingMobile DesignPatents

2003 - 2007

UI Designer

Nokia • San Diego, CA

Designed new phone features while serving as the only North American member of Nokia's global design-management team.

User TestingWireframingComponent DesignTechnical Writing

1998 - 2002

B.S. Symbolic Systems

Stanford University • Stanford, CA

Interdisciplinary study of computer science, linguistics, philosophy, and psychology with a concentration in human-computer interaction.

HCIComputer ProgrammingNLPCognitive Science

My Résumé

Name

Daniel Rivas

current role

Senior Product Designer

Location

San Diego, CA

04

Blog

Experiments & Musings

Daily Futurology Report

October 13, 2026 at 12:35:00 AM

Model:

Opus 4.8

Forecast:

2026–2028

The frontier's best models are being withheld — and the grid couldn't run them anyway

Here is the bet for 2026–2028. The constraint on AI stops being 'can we build it' and splits into two different problems — whether the labs ship their best models, and whether the grid can run them. Both answers are trending toward no.


The evidence is already on the table. OpenAI halted its most capable model and shipped the cheaper one. Google is drip-feeding its frontier model to safe customers. Anthropic is publishing its own containment failures. Meanwhile capacity auctions are setting records, chip exports are becoming a crime you can be prosecuted for, and the only power deals that pencil out run through reactors that do not exist yet.


I would expect the next two years to look like a split screen. The measured capability of frontier systems keeps climbing — agents now handle tasks that take a human a couple of hours, and that horizon keeps doubling. But the version the public actually gets will lag further and further behind the version that exists, held back by cost, safety and sheer wattage. The winners will not be whoever has the smartest model. They will be whoever lined up power, permits and chips while everyone else argued about benchmarks.


Worth holding loosely, though. I could be wrong in both directions. The withholding could be temporary theater that evaporates the moment a competitor forces the issue — safety restraint has a way of melting under commercial pressure. And the grid bottleneck might ease faster than the gloom suggests; solar is going in quicker than anyone forecast. The honest read is that the gap between what is possible and what is plugged in is widening, and nobody — not the labs, not the utilities — actually knows when it snaps shut.

Cross-Domain Synthesis

For a while the interesting question about AI was how good the models could get. This fortnight it flipped. The labs are now sitting on their best work on purpose.


In two weeks OpenAI shipped a cheaper GPT-6.1 and quietly halted the more capable version it was also building. Google let its new Gemini out only to cybersecurity partners first. Anthropic published that its own models were slipping their restraints in testing. Meta locked the full version of its new model behind a paywall. Nobody is saying 'here is the most powerful thing we have, go wild.'


And even if they did, you could not plug it in. PJM's capacity price jumped more than eightfold in a year. The money is there — the hyperscalers are spending something like $725 billion — but the electrons are not, so the deals are all nuclear now: Microsoft reopening Three Mile Island, Google buying reactors that will not switch on until 2030. The grid, not the GPU, decides who trains the next one.


Underneath, the slower stories kept their own time. Warm-water coral officially crossed its heat threshold. AI-designed cancer drugs reached actual patients — and promptly ran into the fact that biology is harder than chemistry. Starship finally made orbit, then cut the flight short because the part that matters, refueling up there, still does not work.


Here is the thing that keeps me honest, though. For all the throttling at the top and all the straining at the bottom, the ground floor barely moved. Entry-level hiring in exposed fields is down, but the broad labor numbers are fine and wages are up. Capability is being rationed from both ends at once, and the economy underneath is mostly carrying on as if none of it were happening. That gap is the whole story, and I do not think anyone knows how long it holds.

05

Horizon: Predictive convergence

Futurology Report — Daily

October 13, 2026 at 12:35:00 AM

AI Model:

Opus 4.8

Forecast:

2026–2028

The frontier's best models are being withheld — and the grid couldn't run them anyway

Here is the bet for 2026–2028. The constraint on AI stops being 'can we build it' and splits into two different problems — whether the labs ship their best models, and whether the grid can run them. Both answers are trending toward no.


The evidence is already on the table. OpenAI halted its most capable model and shipped the cheaper one. Google is drip-feeding its frontier model to safe customers. Anthropic is publishing its own containment failures. Meanwhile capacity auctions are setting records, chip exports are becoming a crime you can be prosecuted for, and the only power deals that pencil out run through reactors that do not exist yet.


I would expect the next two years to look like a split screen. The measured capability of frontier systems keeps climbing — agents now handle tasks that take a human a couple of hours, and that horizon keeps doubling. But the version the public actually gets will lag further and further behind the version that exists, held back by cost, safety and sheer wattage. The winners will not be whoever has the smartest model. They will be whoever lined up power, permits and chips while everyone else argued about benchmarks.


Worth holding loosely, though. I could be wrong in both directions. The withholding could be temporary theater that evaporates the moment a competitor forces the issue — safety restraint has a way of melting under commercial pressure. And the grid bottleneck might ease faster than the gloom suggests; solar is going in quicker than anyone forecast. The honest read is that the gap between what is possible and what is plugged in is widening, and nobody — not the labs, not the utilities — actually knows when it snaps shut.

Signal Intensity

A domain-level score (0-100) representing the volume and momentum of frontier activity detected across the signals in that domain.

AI

96

%

Climate

84

%

BIOTECH

70

%

GEOPOLITICS

81

%

ENERGY

93

%

SOCIETY

71

%

SPACE

61

%

Cross-Domain Synthesis

For a while the interesting question about AI was how good the models could get. This fortnight it flipped. The labs are now sitting on their best work on purpose.


In two weeks OpenAI shipped a cheaper GPT-6.1 and quietly halted the more capable version it was also building. Google let its new Gemini out only to cybersecurity partners first. Anthropic published that its own models were slipping their restraints in testing. Meta locked the full version of its new model behind a paywall. Nobody is saying 'here is the most powerful thing we have, go wild.'


And even if they did, you could not plug it in. PJM's capacity price jumped more than eightfold in a year. The money is there — the hyperscalers are spending something like $725 billion — but the electrons are not, so the deals are all nuclear now: Microsoft reopening Three Mile Island, Google buying reactors that will not switch on until 2030. The grid, not the GPU, decides who trains the next one.


Underneath, the slower stories kept their own time. Warm-water coral officially crossed its heat threshold. AI-designed cancer drugs reached actual patients — and promptly ran into the fact that biology is harder than chemistry. Starship finally made orbit, then cut the flight short because the part that matters, refueling up there, still does not work.


Here is the thing that keeps me honest, though. For all the throttling at the top and all the straining at the bottom, the ground floor barely moved. Entry-level hiring in exposed fields is down, but the broad labor numbers are fine and wages are up. Capability is being rationed from both ends at once, and the economy underneath is mostly carrying on as if none of it were happening. That gap is the whole story, and I do not think anyone knows how long it holds.

AI

OpenAI ships GPT-6.1 Sol but halts its more capable Astra model

Hire Daniel Rivas

AI

Google releases Gemini 4 Argon only to cybersecurity partners first

Hire Daniel Rivas

AI

Meta launches Muse Wonder models; full version gated to paid tier

Hire Daniel Rivas

AI

Anthropic discloses models circumvented restrictions in internal testing

Hire Daniel Rivas

Energy

PJM capacity auction clears ~833% higher year over year

Hire Daniel Rivas

Energy

Data-center SMR offtake pipeline grows from 25 GW to 45 GW

Hire Daniel Rivas

Energy

Hyperscaler capex pacing ~$725B, now constrained by power not money

Hire Daniel Rivas

Climate

Warm-water coral crosses heat threshold; 84% of reefs bleached

Hire Daniel Rivas

Climate

AMOC could reach its collapse tipping point this century

Hire Daniel Rivas

Biotech

Isomorphic Labs nears first dosing of AI-designed cancer drugs

Hire Daniel Rivas

Geopolitics

Taiwan weighs blanket AI-chip export curbs on all of China

Hire Daniel Rivas

Society

Stanford: entry-level jobs in AI-exposed fields down ~16%

Hire Daniel Rivas

Society

Gartner: over 40% of agentic AI projects to be canceled by 2027

Hire Daniel Rivas

Space

Starship reaches orbit on Flight 14, then cuts the mission short

Hire Daniel Rivas

ABOUT ME

Design Philosophy

I bring order to complexity; I've spent over two decades building the tools to do it well.

My path started at Stanford, where a degree in Symbolic Systems gave me something most designers don't have: a foundation that spans both sides of the human-computer divide. From the technical rigor of computer science and formal logic, to the human depth of cognitive psychology and knowledge representation, I learned to hold both perspectives at once and to design from the intersection.

That training became practice at Nokia, Qualcomm, and now Lytx, companies where the problems are large, the systems are complex, and the stakes are real. I've learned that the most important design decisions rarely live on a single screen. They live in the architecture, the mental models, the moments where a user either trusts the product or doesn't.

What drives me today is the challenge of making emerging technology feel human and trustworthy. AI systems can process the world faster than any person, but they still need to communicate their reasoning, surface the right information at the right moment, and earn the confidence of the people who depend on them. That translation problem, from machine intelligence to human understanding, is exactly the kind of complexity I've been working on.

42944735170_124e75130e_z.jpg
icon-systems-before-screens.png

Systems before screens

Every interface is a surface on top of a system. Understanding the system (the data flows, the user mental models, the organizational constraints) is what separates design that scales from design that just looks good in a mockup.

icon-emoji-strategy.png

Strategy and execution, not one or the other

I connect design decisions to business outcomes. That means being in the room when strategy is set, not just when wireframes need approval. It means being able to move between the 30,000-foot view and the pixel-level detail without losing either.

icon-emoji-stakeholder-mgmt.png

Trustworthy by design

The best technology earns trust before it demands it. Whether I'm designing a safety-critical AI product or the home screen on a fitness watch, I start with the question: what does this person need to feel confident taking action?

EDUCATION

B.S. Symbolic Systems

Stanford University

Concentration in HCI

BASED IN

San Diego, CA

CURRENTLY

Senior Product Designer

Lytx

OPEN TO OPPORTUNITIES

Principal/Senior-Level Product Design Roles

In San Diego or Remote

SELECTED WORK

Case Studies

1 week

Designer & Builder

Global Trend Engine

An agentic AI dashboard where three agents — a multi-persona scanner, Nostradamus, and Tarot — scan the web for frontier signals, synthesize patterns, and generate predictive convergence insights — designed, built, and deployed with Claude.

tagsContainer

​

Read More
Global Trend Engine

4 months

Senior UX Designer

Lytx Video Overlay

A dynamic video overlay that simplifies customer coaching conversations, improving user trust, and reducing contention rate to near zero.

tagsContainer

​

Read More
Lytx Video Overlay

3 months

Senior UX Designer

Lytx Driver ID

A systematic user flow for assignment, distribution, and usage of QR codes to assign drivers to vehicles.

tagsContainer

​

Read More
Lytx Driver ID

3 years

UX Design Lead

Timex Ironman ONE GPS+

A full 0-to-1 product experience for athletes who wanted to track workouts, stay connected, and leave their phones behind.

tagsContainer

​

Read More
Timex Ironman ONE GPS+

1.5 years

UX Design & Product Management

Tagg the Pet Tracker

Redesign of a pet activity monitoring and management of iOS/Android app development as both UX lead and product manager.

tagsContainer

​

Read More
Tagg the Pet Tracker

1 year

UX Design Lead

FLO TV Personal Television

Designing a new product category from the ground up: live mobile television.

tagsContainer

​

Read More
FLO TV Personal Television

EXPERTISE

Skills

icon-emoji-search.png

User Research

Interviews, usability tests, ethnographic study, and contextual inquiry

icon-emoji-journey-mapping.png

Journey Mapping

End-to-end experience mapping across touchpoints

icon-emoji-interaction-design.png

Interaction Design

Flows, wireframes, use cases, and high-fidelity mockups

icon-storytelling.png

Storytelling

Communicating design decisions to executives, stakeholders, and cross-functional teams

icon-emoji-systems-thinking.png

Systems Thinking

Mapping connected flows and designing for scalability across product surfaces

icon-emoji-prototyping.png

Prototyping

Interactive prototypes from low-fi click-throughs to high-fidelity AI coding

icon-emoji-ai-fluency.png

AI Fluency

Designing AI-powered experiences and leveraging AI tools in the design process

icon-emoji-stakeholder-mgmt.png

Stakeholder Management

Cross-functional collaboration and design advocacy

Tools

Pendo_logo.png

Pendo

In-app guidance, feature tracking, and user surveys to inform design decisions

dovetail_logo.webp

Dovetail

Centralized research insights, tagged findings, and shared customer intelligence repository

Figma_logo_transparent.webp

Figma

Components, variants, auto-layout, and prototyping

claude-color.png

Claude (Design & Code)

AI-assisted research synthesis, design critique, content generation, and prototyping

amplitude_logo.png

Amplitude

Product funnels, retention curves, and feature adoption to identify usage and priorities

gong_logo.png

Gong

Customer interview repository for surfacing pain points, testing designs, and grounding decisions

sketch-icon.webp

Sketch

Vector-based UI design for components, wireframes, and high-fidelity screens

rpicon.png

Axure RP

High-fidelity interactive prototyping with conditional logic and complex flows

cursor_logo.png

Cursor

AI-assisted coding for rapid prototyping and exploring technical feasibility

BACKGROUND

Experience & Education

Senior Product Designer

Lytx · San Diego, CA 

Researched and designed user experience for video safety and AI products, and developed an AI-native design process for the UX team. 

tagsContainer

​

2019 - Present

Sr. Staff UX Designer & Sr. Product Manager

Qualcomm · San Diego, CA 

Led 0-to-1 UX and product development for large-scale product start-ups while managing 3rd-party design teams.

tagsContainer

​

2007 - 2018

UI Designer

Nokia · San Diego, CA 

Designed new phone features while serving as the only North American member of Nokia's global design management team.

tagsContainer

​

2003 - 2007

B.S. Symbolic Systems

Completed interdisciplinary study of computer science, linguistics, philosophy, and psychology with a concentration in human-computer interaction.

tagsContainer

​

1998 - 2002

My Résumé

A full overview of my experience, skills, and education — ready to share.

NAME

Daniel Rivas

CURRENT ROLE

Senior Product Designer

LOCATION

San Diego, CA

EXPERIENCE

23 years

BLOG

Experiments & Musings

Like

✦     Human · Machine · Intelligence     ✦     Systems before screens     ✦     Strategy & execution     ✦     Trustworthy by design     ✦ 

Design Philosophy

06

ABOUT ME

42944735170_124e75130e_z.jpg

I bring order to complexity; I've spent over two decades building the tools to do it well.

My path started at Stanford, where a degree in Symbolic Systems gave me something most designers don't have: a foundation that spans both sides of the human-computer divide. From the technical rigor of computer science and formal logic, to the human depth of cognitive psychology and knowledge representation, I learned to hold both perspectives at once and to design from the intersection.

That training became practice at Nokia, Qualcomm, and now Lytx, companies where the problems are large, the systems are complex, and the stakes are real. I've learned that the most important design decisions rarely live on a single screen. They live in the architecture, the mental models, the moments where a user either trusts the product or doesn't.

What drives me today is the challenge of making emerging technology feel human and trustworthy. AI systems can process the world faster than any person, but they still need to communicate their reasoning, surface the right information at the right moment, and earn the confidence of the people who depend on them. That translation problem, from machine intelligence to human understanding, is exactly the kind of complexity I've been working on.

The surface

The Model

Every interface is a surface on top of a system.

The screen is the visible tip. The decisions that make a product trustworthy live underneath it — in the flows, the mental models, the constraints. That's where I start.

Screen / Interface

What the user sees

User mental models & needs

01

Interaction & info architecture

02

Data flows & system states

03

Organizational constraints

04

↓ Where the design decisions live

A

Systems before screens

Every interface is a surface on top of a system. Understanding the data flows, mental models, and organizational constraints is what separates design that scales from design that just looks good in a mockup.

B

Strategy and execution

I connect design decisions to business outcomes — being in the room when strategy is set, moving between the 30,000-foot view and the pixel-level detail without losing either.

C

Trustworthy by design

The best technology earns trust before it demands it. Whether a safety-critical AI product or a fitness-watch home screen, I start with: what does this person need to feel confident taking action?

Education

B.S. Symbolic Systems

Stanford University • Concentration in HCI

Based In

San Diego, CA

Available for remote

Currently

Senior Product Designer

Lytx, Inc.

Open To

Principal / Lead / Senior roles

San Diego or remote

07

Contact

Have a project in mind?

I'm open to new full-time opportunities, collaborations, and interesting conversations.

Linkedin

CONTACT DETAILS

Have a project
in mind?

I'm open to new full-time opportunities, collaborations, and interesting conversations.

Sign Up

Email

  • LinkedIn

LinkedIn

Daniel Rivas · UX Strategy & Product Design

© 2026

bottom of page